xxx k H/s

[moesyzlak]

When a hashcat benchmark produces a result such as 120 kH/s (my Dell inspiron 7577, NVidia GeForce 1050i, -m 22000 D- 1,2 -w 3)...

does this mean its trying 12,000 passwords a second, or is it rehashing 12,000 passwords a seconds, i.e. if theres 16388 iterations of the wpa2 algorithm, does it mean its only trying 12000/16388 passwords a second?

Im really getting into this cracking, find it really interesting...

 

[174region174]

When a hashcat benchmark produces a result such as 120 kH/s (my Dell inspiron 7577, NVidia GeForce 1050i, -m 22000 D- 1,2 -w 3)...

does this mean its trying 12,000 passwords a second, or is it rehashing 12,000 passwords a seconds, i.e. if theres 16388 iterations of the wpa2 algorithm, does it mean its only trying 12000/16388 passwords a second?

Im really getting into this cracking, find it really interesting...

Try to put -w 4 on the command line and see how much the brute force speed will increase.

 

[174region174]

If you have win10, remove the video card driver and install cuda_11.4.1_win10
The speed will increase.

 

[moesyzlak]

This seems the be the best I can achieve... any advice or is this the best I can hope for with -m 22000

udo hashcat -b -m 22000 -w 4 -D 1,2,3 -O --force
hashcat (v6.2.4-66-gee3eb21a0) starting in benchmark mode

You have enabled --force to bypass dangerous warnings and errors!
This can hide serious problems and should only be done when debugging.
Do not report hashcat issues encountered when using --force.

nvmlDeviceGetFanSpeed(): Not Supported

CUDA API (CUDA 11.4)
====================
* Device #1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050, 3996/4042 MB, 5MCU

OpenCL API (OpenCL 3.0 CUDA 11.4.94) - Platform #1 [NVIDIA Corporation]
=======================================================================
* Device #2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050, skipped

OpenCL API (OpenCL 3.0 ) - Platform #2 [Intel(R) Corporation]
=============================================================
* Device #3: Intel(R) Graphics Gen9 [0x591b], 3072/6257 MB (1564 MB allocatable), 23MCU

OpenCL API (OpenCL 1.2 pocl 1.6, None+Asserts, LLVM 9.0.1, RELOC, SLEEF, DISTRO, POCL_DEBUG) - Platform #3 [The pocl project]
=============================================================================================================================
* Device #4: pthread-Intel(R) Core(TM) i5-7300HQ CPU @ 2.50GHz, 2855/5774 MB (1024 MB allocatable), 4MCU

Benchmark relevant options:
===========================
* --force
* --opencl-device-types=1,2,3
* --optimized-kernel-enable
* --workload-profile=4

-------------------------------------------------------------
* Hash-Mode 22000 (WPA-PBKDF2-PMKID+EAPOL) [Iterations: 4095]
-------------------------------------------------------------

Speed.#1.........: 106.3 kH/s (381.88ms) @ Accel:64 Loops:1024 Thr:512 Vec:1
Speed.#3.........: 7115 H/s (403.14ms) @ Accel:64 Loops:256 Thr:32 Vec:1
Speed.#4.........: 8202 H/s (59.73ms) @ Accel:512 Loops:1024 Thr:1 Vec:8
Speed.#*.........: 121.6 kH/s

Started: Sat Oct 9 03:12:52 2021
Stopped: Sat Oct 9 03:13:12 2021

 

[pasnger57]

Oh dear go you used sudo to run this...
Please for the love of god dont dont do that
Runnig shit at root is risky
2nd you are forcing this its not idla as stadatd by its wornings
3nd stick to gpu the cpu will offer a bit of a boost but at the cost of the gpu lag
So just drop the -D flag and its
A work load profile of 4 is extreem and not idal 3 is is fine
Unless your game to melt your box down and make it unresponsive

 

[moesyzlak]

I only used --force for the benchmark, and never usuallly use workload 4 - was just trying to see the best I could achieve - does this seem low for my setup - 4 y.o laptop,,, :-/

 

[174region174]

Normal.There is a topic about benchmarks on the forum. Find and see what cars others have

 

[pasnger57]

For a lap top its prity avrg for a 1050 that a bit slow ... my 970 peek out 200kh/s on wpa2 but thats cus the have a highet tdp cap of 170wats i woud gues the laptop 1050m is cap low for themls and limatations of what gpu can draw agenst a battery .... and yes pluged in a walll your drawing off the batt amps limits
Run nvidia-smi and check the powe limits of the 1050

 

[174region174]

For a lap top its prity avrg for a 1050 that a bit slow ... my 970 peek out 200kh/s on wpa2 but thats cus the have a highet tdp cap of 170wats i woud gues the laptop 1050m is cap low for themls and limatations of what gpu can draw agenst a battery .... and yes pluged in a walll your drawing off the batt amps limits
Run nvidia-smi and check the powe limits of the 1050

Most likely, they imposed a restriction on laptops.

 

[moesyzlak]

Wed Oct 13 19:10:13 2021
+-----------------------------------------------------------------------------+
| NVIDIA-SMI 470.57.02 Driver Version: 470.57.02 CUDA Version: 11.4 |
|-------------------------------+----------------------+----------------------+
| GPU Name Persistence-M| Bus-Id Disp.A | Volatile Uncorr. ECC |
| Fan Temp Perf Pwr:Usage/Cap| Memory-Usage | GPU-Util Compute M. |
| | | MIG M. |
|===============================+======================+======================|
| 0 NVIDIA GeForce ... Off | 00000000:01:00.0 Off | N/A |
| N/A 44C P8 N/A / N/A | 4MiB / 4042MiB | 0% Default |
| | | N/A |
+-------------------------------+----------------------+----------------------+

+-----------------------------------------------------------------------------+
| Processes: |
| GPU GI CI PID Type Process name GPU Memory |
| ID ID Usage |
|=============================================================================|
| 0 N/A N/A 710 G /usr/lib/xorg/Xorg 4MiB |
+-----------------------------------------------------------------------------+

 

[moesyzlak]

does it need to be running?

 

[kevtheskin]

When a hashcat benchmark produces a result such as 120 kH/s (my Dell inspiron 7577, NVidia GeForce 1050i, -m 22000 D- 1,2 -w 3)...

does this mean its trying 12,000 passwords a second, or is it rehashing 12,000 passwords a seconds, i.e. if theres 16388 iterations of the wpa2 algorithm, does it mean its only trying 12000/16388 passwords a second?

Im really getting into this cracking, find it really interesting...

I think it's 120.000 hashes per second

 

[pasnger57]

Wed Oct 13 19:10:13 2021
+-----------------------------------------------------------------------------+
| NVIDIA-SMI 470.57.02 Driver Version: 470.57.02 CUDA Version: 11.4 |
|-------------------------------+----------------------+----------------------+
| GPU Name Persistence-M| Bus-Id Disp.A | Volatile Uncorr. ECC |
| Fan Temp Perf Pwr:Usage/Cap| Memory-Usage | GPU-Util Compute M. |
| | | MIG M. |
|===============================+======================+======================|
| 0 NVIDIA GeForce ... Off | 00000000:01:00.0 Off | N/A |
| N/A 44C P8 N/A / N/A | 4MiB / 4042MiB | 0% Default |
| | | N/A |
+-------------------------------+----------------------+----------------------+

+-----------------------------------------------------------------------------+
| Processes: |
| GPU GI CI PID Type Process name GPU Memory |
| ID ID Usage |
|=============================================================================|
| 0 N/A N/A 710 G /usr/lib/xorg/Xorg 4MiB |
+-----------------------------------------------------------------------------+

Must be a OLD card and cuda 1.2
a more currnet card woud look like this
─$ nvidia-smi
Wed Oct 13 17:27:21 2021
+-----------------------------------------------------------------------------+
| NVIDIA-SMI 470.57.02 Driver Version: 470.57.02 CUDA Version: 11.4 |
|-------------------------------+----------------------+----------------------+
| GPU Name Persistence-M| Bus-Id Disp.A | Volatile Uncorr. ECC |
| Fan Temp Perf Pwr:Usage/Cap| Memory-Usage | GPU-Util Compute M. |
| | | MIG M. |
|===============================+======================+======================|
| 0 NVIDIA GeForce ... Off | 00000000:01:00.0 On | N/A |
|100% 77C P2 147W / 163W | 3410MiB / 4042MiB | 100% Default |
| | | N/A |
+-------------------------------+----------------------+----------------------+
| 1 NVIDIA GeForce ... Off | 00000000:02:00.0 Off | N/A |
|100% 69C P2 139W / 163W | 3190MiB / 4043MiB | 100% Default |
| | | N/A |
+-------------------------------+----------------------+----------------------+
| 2 NVIDIA GeForce ... Off | 00000000:04:00.0 Off | N/A |
|100% 63C P2 124W / 200W | 3190MiB / 4043MiB | 100% Default |
| | | N/A |
+-------------------------------+----------------------+----------------------+

+-----------------------------------------------------------------------------+
| Processes: |
| GPU GI CI PID Type Process name GPU Memory |
| ID ID Usage |
|=============================================================================|
| 0 N/A N/A 1142 G /usr/lib/xorg/Xorg 153MiB |
| 0 N/A N/A 1941 G xfwm4 2MiB |
| 0 N/A N/A 116705 C ./xmrig 3179MiB |
| 0 N/A N/A 126459 G ...AAAAAAAAA= --shared-files 66MiB |
| 1 N/A N/A 1142 G /usr/lib/xorg/Xorg 4MiB |
| 1 N/A N/A 116705 C ./xmrig 3179MiB |
| 2 N/A N/A 1142 G /usr/lib/xorg/Xorg 4MiB |
| 2 N/A N/A 116705 C ./xmrig 3179MiB |
+-----------------------------------------------------------------------------+

 

[moesyzlak]

Must be a OLD card and cuda 1.2
a more currnet card woud look like this
─$ nvidia-smi
Wed Oct 13 17:27:21 2021
+-----------------------------------------------------------------------------+
| NVIDIA-SMI 470.57.02 Driver Version: 470.57.02 CUDA Version: 11.4 |
|-------------------------------+----------------------+----------------------+
| GPU Name Persistence-M| Bus-Id Disp.A | Volatile Uncorr. ECC |
| Fan Temp Perf Pwr:Usage/Cap| Memory-Usage | GPU-Util Compute M. |
| | | MIG M. |
|===============================+======================+======================|
| 0 NVIDIA GeForce ... Off | 00000000:01:00.0 On | N/A |
|100% 77C P2 147W / 163W | 3410MiB / 4042MiB | 100% Default |
| | | N/A |
+-------------------------------+----------------------+----------------------+
| 1 NVIDIA GeForce ... Off | 00000000:02:00.0 Off | N/A |
|100% 69C P2 139W / 163W | 3190MiB / 4043MiB | 100% Default |
| | | N/A |
+-------------------------------+----------------------+----------------------+
| 2 NVIDIA GeForce ... Off | 00000000:04:00.0 Off | N/A |
|100% 63C P2 124W / 200W | 3190MiB / 4043MiB | 100% Default |
| | | N/A |
+-------------------------------+----------------------+----------------------+

+-----------------------------------------------------------------------------+
| Processes: |
| GPU GI CI PID Type Process name GPU Memory |
| ID ID Usage |
|=============================================================================|
| 0 N/A N/A 1142 G /usr/lib/xorg/Xorg 153MiB |
| 0 N/A N/A 1941 G xfwm4 2MiB |
| 0 N/A N/A 116705 C ./xmrig 3179MiB |
| 0 N/A N/A 126459 G ...AAAAAAAAA= --shared-files 66MiB |
| 1 N/A N/A 1142 G /usr/lib/xorg/Xorg 4MiB |
| 1 N/A N/A 116705 C ./xmrig 3179MiB |
| 2 N/A N/A 1142 G /usr/lib/xorg/Xorg 4MiB |
| 2 N/A N/A 116705 C ./xmrig 3179MiB |
+-----------------------------------------------------------------------------+

What kinda H/S for WPA2 do you get with a rig like that?

 

[pasnger57]

What kinda H/S for WPA2 do you get with a rig like that?

the 3 X 970's do 580Kh/s at peak but avg in around 560Kh/s

 

[174region174]

Look at everything here...

Post Your GPU Benchmarks for WPA

This thread is for people to post their WPA benchmarks & GPU details. (& photos if you like) Mode -m 2500 - 16800 - 22000 ONLY (All others will be removed) Please add the word BENCHMARK at the top of all benchmarking posts Don't forget to post your Hashcat version & OS information Feel free...

forum.hashkiller.io